Skip to main content

IELTS · TOEFL Writing

Why does your score keep landing in the same place?

Plenty of services will underline what is wrong. But if nobody tells you whether an error is a slip of grammar or a failure to develop your argument, the next test takes marks off in exactly the same place.

Writing PT does not stop at a score. It shows you, criterion by criterion, why you scored what you scored — and which sentences to fix first.

Your first mock test is free when you subscribe. Cancel within 7 days and you are not charged.

Today's diagnosis

IELTS Academic · Task 2

Example
6.5Predicted band
Task response
6.0
Coherence & cohesion
6.5
Lexical resource
7.0
Grammar range & accuracy
6.0

AI diagnosis

Argument development, not grammar, is holding this score down.

Rewrite this part first

The real problem

You are not short of practice. You are short of a diagnosis.

Put enough stalled essays side by side and the mistakes repeat with uncomfortable regularity. Writers know what they got wrong. They rarely know why.

  • 01

    Every reader says something different

    Show one essay to two tutors and they mark different things. Without the official descriptors as the reference, feedback becomes taste.

  • 02

    The surface gets fixed, the score does not move

    Articles and tenses are corrected, yet the band stays flat. Most lost marks come from task response and argument development, not grammar.

  • 03

    You cannot afford it often enough

    One-to-one correction costs time and money, so most people get a handful of sessions right before the exam and nothing in between.

  • 04

    There is no way to see progress

    Have you ever compared last month’s essay with today’s against the same yardstick? Without a record, progress is only a feeling.

How this differs

Not better than a tutor. Doing a different job.

This is not a replacement for a human reader. It takes on the part humans struggle to repeat — judging against the same standard, often, and keeping the record.

  • One-to-one tutoring

    What it does well
    Reads context and polishes expression
    Where it stops
    Standards vary by tutor, and cost limits how often you can go
  • Grammar checkers

    What it does well
    Catches surface errors quickly
    Where it stops
    Never looks at task response or argument development
  • Model-answer books

    What it does well
    Shows what a strong answer looks like
    Where it stops
    Cannot tell you how yours differs from it
  • Writing PT

    What it does well
    Criterion scores, sentence-level causes and an order to fix them in
    Where it stops
    A predicted score — it does not replace the official result

How training works

Finish fixing one essay before you move to the next.

Read the score, move on, and the same mistake follows you. Writing PT makes you rewrite, then scores the rewrite so you can see whether anything actually changed.

  1. 01

    Sit the test

    Same structure and timing as the real exam.

  2. 02

    Criterion scores

    Four criteria scored separately, each with its reasoning.

  3. 03

    Sentence diagnosis

    Which sentence is costing you, and why.

  4. 04

    Root cause

    Surface slips separated from deeper structural problems.

  5. 05

    Prescription

    Three things to fix, in priority order.

  6. 06

    Rewrite

    Same prompt, written again to the prescription.

  7. 07

    Re-score

    See in numbers what actually improved.

  8. Next mock test

Re-scoring a rewrite does not use up a test from your plan.

Exams covered

The exam you are actually sitting, under the same conditions.

Structure and timing differ by exam. Practise under different conditions and the real test will hand you something you have never seen.

IELTS Writing · Academic · General Training

Two pieces in sixty minutes, at the pace of the real thing.

Task 1 and Task 2 sit in one session under a single 60-minute clock. Mismanaging that hour is itself a common way to lose marks, so practice has to carry the same pressure.

  • Task 1

    20 min suggested150 words minimum

  • Task 2

    40 min suggested250 words minimum

IELTS Writing mock test (Academic · General Training)

TOEFL Writing · iBT

Read, listen, respond — in the order and timing of the real test.

The integrated task gives you three minutes with the passage, one play of the lecture, and twenty minutes to write. The passage disappears while the lecture plays, just as it does in the exam. Whatever you miss in the listening shows up in the answer.

  • Integrated Writing

    3 min reading · lecture · 20 min writing150–225 words suggested

  • Writing for an Academic Discussion

    10 min100 words minimum

TOEFL iBT Writing mock test

Why we built it

The gap is not effort. It is the absence of a shared standard.

IELTS and TOEFL Writing correction in Korea rests almost entirely on an individual tutor’s experience. The problem is structural, not a lack of care.

  • Rater variance

    Internalising the official descriptors takes time. When the yardstick differs, the same essay gets different feedback and the learner cannot tell what to trust.

  • A hard ceiling on throughput

    A careful reader manages two or three essays an hour. Peak season means queues, and a school can only grow by hiring more tutors.

  • Feedback that stops before the cause

    Marking an error right or wrong never separates a surface slip from a misread task. That is why the same mistake returns.

  • A history that never accumulates

    If attempts and corrections are not recorded, progress cannot be measured, and a school cannot spot a student who is about to drop out.

So scoring, diagnosis, root-cause analysis, prescription and re-verification were built as one pipeline. Not to replace a human reader, but to take over the part that is hard for a human to repeat.

R&D programme

Five engines connecting diagnosis to prescription.

The service running today is Claude-based automatic scoring. The five modules below are the research programme that will deepen that pipeline. They are not implemented performance.

Running today

Claude-based automatic scoring against the official criteria, sentence-level diagnosis and generated prescriptions

  • M1Development target

    Multimodal answer structure recognition

    Extracts paragraphs, sentences and structural markers from handwritten scripts and turns them into measurable signals.

  • M2Development target

    Fine-grained diagnosis and anomaly detection

    Locates passages that depart from the distribution of high-scoring answers and calibrates the score.

  • M3Development target

    Two-stage root cause classification with retrieval

    Separates surface causes from deeper ones and cites the assessment descriptor behind each prescription.

  • M4Development target

    Churn prediction and intervention policy

    Sees a learner drifting away early and adjusts when and how to intervene.

  • M5Development target

    Generative prescription content

    Produces model answers at the target band, practice items and step-by-step comments.

Technology

Learner feedback

We trained speaking this way first.

These reviews come from learners of our sister service, Speaking PT. They are not Writing PT reviews, and they are published with consent. Writing PT reviews will follow the beta.

  • It was the first time I understood why my score was not rising. Instead of moving on from a weak answer, I rewrote it, took the test again and had it re-scored — and I could feel the difference.

    Kim

    Year 12 · IELTS 7.0 (Speaking 6.0)

    Speaking PT learner
  • It does not just hand you a number. Checking what was weak and then building the answer again was the part that worked. I no longer freeze in the exam room.

    Hong

    University Y1 · IELTS 7.5 (Speaking 6.5)

    Speaking PT learner
  • What frustrated me most after a test was the question "so what do I fix?". Identifying the weak part, rewriting it and having it re-scored was the most effective thing I did.

    Hong

    Year 12 · IELTS 8.0 (Speaking 7.5)

    Speaking PT learner

Why we built it

Twenty-six years in study abroad, and the same question

1998
First year in language education
8,000+
Learners advised on study abroad
500+
Language institution curricula compared

It started in 1998 at a language school in Canada. From 2001 the founder ran study-abroad agencies covering the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines and Malta, placing more than 8,000 learners and comparing the curricula of close to 500 language institutions.

The same scene kept repeating. A student writing hard whose score would not move. A student who took correction after correction and still lost marks in the same place at the next sitting. The obstacle was never effort — it was that nobody was telling them what to fix against a consistent standard.

That led to building TOEIC and IELTS programmes and a repetition-based personal training system, run in person for years. Writing PT moves that method to writing. It is not a service that rewrites your essay for you; it is a training tool that tells you what to change and why, against the same standard every time.

Scores rise on accurate diagnosis, not on more pages written.

Subscribe and your first mock test is free. Cancel within 7 days and nothing is charged.

Writing PT — AI scoring and personalised feedback for IELTS & TOEFL Writing